英语辩论赛二辩稿模板
篇一：英语BP辩论反方二辩辩论稿
反方二辩：
Thank you,Mr.（Ms.）speaker. Ladies and gentlemen, good evening! providing extra incentives to scientists from universities and research institutions, therefore increasing innovation. This is wrong. Firstly, many scientists work for pharmaceutical companies directly . Secondly, scientists at universities and research institutions are paid by pharmaceutical companies to undertake research for them. Why is this important? It means that scientists are actually harmed under the proposition's model, not helped. When patents are removed,
pharmaceutical companies can no longer earn monopoly profits.
Now I’why we save more lives? Firstly, under our plan you can pay scientists double the bonuses they get paid and still get the job done way below the current cost. This is because we won’t have to pay $6-10 million a year for the CEO of the firm in question or billions in publicity. We’re also providing incentives for the same companies to research novel drugs. Rather than fret over prices remaining high for 20 years to
make a profit we're allowing them a generous research and development-linked profit on delivery. Secondly, we have the preposterous claim that university research is funded by corporations! The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, an industry lobby group, estimates that private industry finances only about 43% of drug development! Our plan allows for universities and government institutions to take on more research and even provide them with concrete benefits. Thirdly, more than 69% of those with HIV lack access to the medication to treat it. Rather than pay the current prices for that 69% for as long as they need them what we do is pay for them in a
drastically cheaper one-off payment that would allow for generic copies to be made ad infinite. This way we also don't endorse current practice that actively discourages innovation but instead create a new regime that truly rewards it allowing everyone to benefit from genuinely novel drugs.
Fourthly, the opp has argued our plan would not encourage cheaper drugs with the same effects to be produced. Of course not! If we create generic drugs, accessible to all why need a “new” drug that does exactly the same? This is what happens under the status quo;companies creating useless “me-too drugs” one after the other rather than researching into novel drugs that have something to offer. Rather than see this lack of innovation as a problem they are offering its solution as an argument .
In addition, if companies with patents charge very high prices, that creates a market for cheaper drugs for that illness, so other companies can move into that market. This means innovation is encouraged, there are more drugs and the price isn't an issue in the long term. Under the prop's model it is necessary that generics are more profitable than new drugs for a company to produce, or else none of them will, instead going for the massive prize for new drugs. If generics are more popular, no new drugs will be produced, only copies.
For the second aspect, abolishing patents for life-saving medicines would not decline the price of prop have founded their case on the idea that lots of generic producers will be able
to produce drugs cheaply if patents are bypassed. However, there needs to be a massive incentive to get these drugs developed in t(来自: 小龙 文档 网:英语辩论赛二辩稿模板)he first place. They cost up to $800 million to get to market, and this means huge amounts of investment are required. Not only does this investment need to be payed back, there needs to be a promise of strong profit to pay off the risk of such a huge
investment being unsuccessful (most drugs never go to market). As patents provide the ability to charge monopoly pricing, if there was no patent for life-saving drugs there would need to be an even greater incentive to stop companies producing non-life saving drugs instead. What this means is that whatever model the prop propose to provide these incentives, it will always be more expensive than allowing a company to patent a product, which at least makes it as valuable as a non-life saving drug. medicines,thus,abolishing patents for life-saving medicines seems to save more lives at the beginning, it would kill more lives in the long run.
篇二：英语辩论范例
英语辩论赛
话题：当代社会男人压力大还是女人压力大
主持：主持词：Good morning everyone, today, we will bring you a small but brilliant debate. I hope all of you would enjoy the time.（介绍来宾）The judges of today's debate are our teacher and everybody here! Welcome! The topic for our debate today is "whether the pressure of men is more than women?" First please let me introduce the contestants of both sides. Those on the pros are Liu Junyi and me. Those on the cons are Gao Tianli and Lei Feiyan. As everybody is ready now, here starts the debate.
The first session: Statement of their arguments: ----the For-side, please
正方一辩：我方观点是当今社会男人的压力比女人的压力大。在当今社会事实是男人承受的压力远大于女人的压力，不仅从社会角度，从工作角度，从家庭角度都对男人有更多的要求，男人被要求能够很好的处理社会交际，能够出色的工作，能够赚取更多的钱，能够很好的照顾家庭和孩子。因此，在当代社会，男人承受了比女人更多的心理压力。
Our view is that the pressure of men is more than women in today's society. The fact is that the men’s pressure is far greater than women, not only from a social point of view, from the working point of view, from the families point of view , the society has more demands on men, men are required to have good social communication, excellent work, to earn more money, to take care of their families. Therefore, in contemporary society, men suffer more psychological pressure than women.
主持----the Against-side, please
反方一辩:我方的观点是当今社会女人的压力比男人压力大，随着社会的发展，女人在社会中的角色发生了重大变化，原来的女人只需要在家相夫教子就行，但是那个年代早已一去不复返了。女人在当今社会不仅要照顾家庭，而且自身也承担着社会中巨大的工作压力，因此，我方坚持认为在当今社会，女人承受了更大的压力。
Our view is that the pressure of women is more than men in today's society。With the development of society, the role of women in society greatly changes. In original ,women only need to assist their husbands and educate the children ,
Nowadays. A woman not only to take care of the family, and also bear the tremendous pressure from society. Therefore, we detected that in today's society, women suffer greater pressure.
主持：After the excellent arguments presentation from both side, now we move on to free debate session. Let me first!
自由辩论
正方二辩： 当今社会对男人的要求比女人的要求高很多，在如今如此大的竞争压力下，男人为了家庭不得不寻求一份稳定的工作，努力赚取养家的资本，哪怕在工作中不如意，也只能默默承受。因为一旦男人失去了工作，整个家庭将陷入严重的危机，这使得男人承受了巨大压力的同时也不敢轻易更换不如意的工作。因此，当代社会男人承受比女人更大的压力。
In today's society, requirements on men is much higher than women's, under so much competitive pressures, The man have to find a stable job for the family, to earn more money to support his families. Even if he is unhappy at work, he must endure. The reason is once the men lose their jobs, the whole family will be plunged into serious trouble, which makes the man under great pressure, while also not easy to replace unsatisfactory work. Therefore, men suffer greater pressure than women in contemporary society.
反方二辩：正如正方所言社会对我们给了我们更多的要求以及更大的压力。仅仅工作一项就使得我们难以喘息，更何况当代社会女人不仅自己要努力工作，承担社会给予的巨大压力，而且更多地要承担几乎整个家庭生活所给的压力。每天要做饭，洗衣服，照顾丈夫孩子，这些事已经使得女人忙得黑白颠倒，再加上工作上的巨大压力，使得当代女人超额承受着巨大的压力。 As you said the society has given us more demands and greater pressure. Just work making us difficult to breathe , moreover modern women not only to work hard, bear enormous social pressure , but also have to undertake almost the entire
pressure from family and life. Cooking, washing, taking care of her husband and child every day have made women day and night reversed , combined with the enormous pressure at work, so the modern women under great pressure.
正方一辩：当然，你说得非常有道理，但是所有的前提是女人自己来选择。如果女人感到压力大，她可以从二中选一，可以回归家庭来减轻自身压力，而男人别无选择，他们即使遇到这种超额的压力，唯一的选择就是忍受、承担，从而使之承受了不仅是工作的压力，而且还有很大的心理负担。
Of course, what you said is very reasonable, but premise is must choose by women themselves. If the women were feeling excessive pressure, they can pick one from two. They were able to return home to relieve their stress, while men have no choice,
even if they bear excessive pressure, the only choice who can make is to endure, to bear, thus making it not only to withstand the pressure of work, but also a great psychological burden.
反方一辩：像你方所说的，的确没错，可是在当代社会中，事实是女人几乎都做出了不仅顾家而且在外工作的选择。在家庭方面，日常烦琐的小事，抚养孩子健康成长，照顾好自己的老公。在工作方面，工作的压力，同事竞争的压力，人际关系的处理，每个也使得女人疲惫不堪。因此我方认为当代的女人压力大于男人的压力。
Just like you have said, that’s right, but in contemporary society, the fact is that
almost all women have made the choice ,while not only care about their families and work outside. In the family, the daily trivial things, raising the children, taking good care of husband. At work, the pressure from itself , the pressure of competition
among colleagues, the interpersonal relationship, each one makes woman exhausted. Therefore we think that women‘s pressure is greater than man in the modern society.
主持：Now with such a brilliant debate contribution from both sides, we all have some understanding of the arguments. I think everyone has their own views about it. Thank you again！
篇三：英语_辩论稿_完整版
辩论稿（全部英语）
1.正方一辩：Are interpersonal relationship more important than one’s practical ability to a successful career?
Dear Mr President, Friends of the other debate, my friends: Hello everybody!
As is known to all , The 21st century is the century of talents’ outbreak. It is a highly competitive age. but if you want to obtain a successful career, it relys on not only the practical ability of outstanding individuals, but also good relationships. Therefore, our view is that relationship is more important than the practical ability for a successful career. Here we described the following four aspects. First, as the development of the times, everyone should be raised to their real ability, but the single person's capacity is limited. A person's success, 85% attributed to his personal connections. Seemingly fortune to come, in fact, mostly the result of hard work,contacts. Second, we live in a certain social group among the people. A person's survival and development are inseparable from interaction with others. Chinese saying goes: at home by their parents, go out to rely on friends. If a person can properly handle the relationship, he can overcome many difficulties.
Third, Fowler said that the closet friend is better than deposits in business. With good relationships, we can be better in many areas
and create more wealth.
Fourth, as a college student, every day we live in the campus, to deeply realize that here is a small community. Even if a person with a greater capacity, he can not organize an event all by himself.
A recent survey showed that fifteen percent of success is contributed by a person’s professional percents rely on personal relationships. In summary, we must insist that relationship is more important than the practical ability for a successful career.
2.反方一辩：Respect other friends, chairman of the divides, each friend: hello!
Today's opportunity to come to grips with so many friends and this undoubtedly superior personal quality and ability is a promotion of opportunity. We think that an individual career success, personal ability is more important than relationships.
We think: an individual career success, by strength, no strength, interpersonal and how? Strength by himself, interpersonal relations also rely on yourself. Interpersonal relationship just for one person to provide a ready a shortcut to success.
Admittedly, personal ability and interpersonal is successful two prerequisite, and today we is exploring the among them successful process in which the crucial: first, from philosophical Angle, the
development of internal is things root causes, determines the nature of
things and the direction of development, external cause is things develop external conditions. Individual struggle is the internal cause and external cause interpersonal relationship is, therefore, own struggle is the key to success; In the second place, from success successful process to see, we first need to determine target, so as to choose direction and type, again through his own personal struggle, with their own quality and ability the enhancement, to expand
interpersonal relationship, using interpersonal relationships, achieve their work and the perfect combination of external
We all know, interpersonal relationship is again good, have no ability to also won't succeed. Only watched his repeated failure. On the premise of a fine winged capacity. Gold shine is the gold itself became! We think: interpersonal influence to be successful, it is like a good journey, the journey to walk, inevitable energy, wind, but if there is no firm to reach objective decision and overcome difficulties of perseverance and hard sweat, is impossible to reach the shore.
Downwind or downwind or as long as we firmly stepping to the goal, we will definitely be able to arrive.
Look at the great is how successful it, that is the gold and the
individual effort, interpersonal relationship is a result of people, if their don't strive for, no ability to fight for, interpersonal relations will not come himself, and waiting for is only pulp. Only oneself to have true
ability really ability to overcome everything.
To sum up, we think that an individual career success personal ability is more important than relationships.
3.反方二辩提问（一辩）：Would I ask the first debater a question : Just in your account, you said that 85% person make success with interpersonal relationship, where did the data come from? And even if I don’t challenged this data, Edison had said: "genius is one percent inspiration and ninety-nine percent perspiration.” Isn't the personal ability so important?
4.正方一辩回答：As the debate ，ninties perspiration plus one
inspiration was a success, a person is required to pay 99 sweat, but the team of ten people only should spend 50 sweats and 50 inspirations to gain the success,Everybady can find which relationship is better meet the efficiency of modern society demands?
It is clear that good relationships will be more than infinitely expand your horizons, so you do not have to take so many detours.
5.反方二辩提问（三辩）：Would I ask the third debater a question : Your statement said: students should pay more attention to build
relationships in the school. So I want to ask you whether the study is not important? Obviously, the study is very important, and It is just one’s practical ability.
6.正方三辩回答：
7.正方四辩补充发言：Also known as interpersonal relationships, is a basic concept of sociology, its meaning is between people, the process of interaction, through the thoughts, feelings, behavior of the mutual exchange and interaction generated. People as social animals, even with a more tenacious survival skills, from social interaction, and can not have more development, because he is a man in combat. We are a group of people in the struggle.
8.正方二辩提问（一辩）：Would I ask the first debater a question : if you think what a CEO needs most is a practical ability, so why will he hear so much about interpersonal relationship lecture?
9.反方一辩回答：They attend the lecture interpersonal relationship is in order to increase the ability of individuals with their own personal ability of interpersonal relations to succeed in his career, rather than using interpersonal relationship.
10. 正方二辩提问（三辩）：Would I ask the third debater a question: practical ability is IQ and interpersonal relationship is EQ, success come from 20% of IQ and 80% of EQ, what do you think of it?
11. 反方三辩回答：
myfellowdebater,’,myfellowdebater,haven’tyouheardofEdison’ssayings:99%perspirationplus1%inspirationequalssuccess?Ithink
《英语辩论赛二辩稿模板》相关文档：
科技发展的利弊辩论赛主持词09-22
辩论赛主持人主持词7篇09-22
科技发展弊大于利还是利大于弊辩论赛主持词09-22
科技发展辩论赛反方辩词09-22
辩论赛活动主题策划方案（精选3篇）09-24
关于辩论赛活动的策划方案09-24
辩论赛活动策划方案09-24
公司辩论赛活动方案09-24
辩论赛活动策划方案通用15篇09-24
某单位辩论赛活动策划方案范文09-24
